Posted on: October 29, 2009 1:24 pm
This is possibly the best sports time of the year. Don't get me wrong. I love March Madness and all that time of the year brings with spring training and the golf season warming up, but this is the time of year I really look forward to! The leaves change colors, college football on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays, NFL on Sundays, great golf weather (at least in Atlanta!), the NBA has tipped off and the beginning of college basketball is near. This is an exciting time for CBB. Every team has question marks and hopes. Everyone has championship aspirations. From Air Force to Youngstown State, every one has a chance to make it to the big dance. The advantage of college basketball over college football is the importance of the ENTIRE regular season. People like to make the argument that college football's regular season would be tainted by a playoff. Tell that to a BCS team who stumbles out of the gate losing their first 2 games. All of a sudden the next 10 do not matter as much. Put a playoff in place and the next 10 become so much more important. The regular season shouldn't be a playoff, it should determine the playoffs. Just my opinion, but there is a reason that every other major sport on earth has a playoff system. Even ancient civilizations knew this was the right way to determine champions.
What is your favorite time of the year for sports? Why?
Posted on: March 5, 2009 11:00 am
Edited on: March 10, 2009 9:14 am
As this time of year approaches it brings with it many quandaries. Who to put in the tournament and who to leave out. Do you reward teams like Maryland for playing a difficult schedule but struggled to an 18-11 record or a team like Davidson? Maryland has wins over UNC, VA Tech, Michigan, Miami and @ Michigan State, but they were blown out by Georgetown, Duke and Gonzaga. I believe it isn't just good enough to have solid teams on your schedule. You have to win at least one of those games to prove you belong. I believe that if you prove you can BEAT a good team it should go a long way toward solidifying your tournament resume. Davidson beat WVU @ WVU and N.C. State.
I think it depends on what you believe the committee's job should be. Is it to reward a team for their regular season or is it to put teams in the tournament that has a legitimate chance to win it all? If it is the former you may lean to Siena and if it is the latter, you may lean towards Maryland. If you match the Sienas and Niagaras of the college basketball world against the Marylands and Villanovas of the world, the UMDs and Villanovas win at least 8 out of 10 times. Maryland and Villanova could beat any team in the tournament 4 out of 10 times. I don't believe the same is true for most of the smaller conference teams. Other than UNLV in '90 who had 4 NBA players on their starting 5, there hasn't been a team from outside the major conferences win an NCAA basketball title since
I know it sounds like I think the big conferences should get the nod, but that is where my dilemma begins. There is nothing more exciting than watching a team like George Mason from 2006 or Davidson from last year pull off upsets and advance through the tourney. I always have a hard time making up my mind about what I want the selection committee to focus on. I am glad I don't have to choose.